I have written before about research that clearly
demonstrates improved learning after sleep. Sleep promotes the
"consolidation" of recently acquired short-term memories into more
permanent memories. Impaired
consolidation is a major problem in teaching and learning. Teachers often have
to repeat the same instruction again and again, and yet many children still do
not perform well on high-stakes tests. Anything teachers can do to improve
retention of instruction would be useful, and that includes making school
children aware that they probably need to get more sleep. The well-known change
in sleep cycles during adolescence makes a strong case for starting school
later in the morning. But another issue is whether or not naps during the
school day would improve learning.
A recent study in Brazilian schools has addressed this
question by having 371 6th graders take a nap after receiving a 15-minute
lecture on intentionally novel information that was not relevant to the normal
curriculum. Students were then given a surprise multiple-choice test on this
content at three different times after the lecture: 1, 2, and 5 days after the
lecture. Scores were compared with that
of a pre-test on this material before the lecture.
Students were divided into a nap group, in which students
were given sleep masks and encouraged to try to sleep, lying down on mats in a
quiet room. The other group went to a regular class by their usual teacher after
the lecture.
Not surprisingly, both groups showed improved scores (12%
gain) when tested the next day. However, this gain disappeared by five days in
the non-nap group, whereas essentially no decline in test scores was evident at
testing two or five days later. Teachers would not be surprised that students
soon forgot what they are taught. In this situation, the preserved memory in
the nap group was especially impressive, given that the study was designed to impair
learning in both nap and non-nap groups in four ways:
1.
Students were not allowed to take notes.
2.
Students were not encouraged to remember this
information.
3.
The lecture topic was not relevant to the
curriculum.
4.
Students did not know they were going to be
tested.
If these constraints on learning had not been present, I
suspect that the nap effect would have been much larger. Moreover, there was no
objective measure of how much actual sleep each student had. Many might have
just been resting. Data were not tracked by individual student, but rather
averaged over the whole group. Finally, multiple-choice tests were used, and
these only test recognition memory. If naps do improve memory, a larger nap
effect might be seen with tests that call for students to generate a remembered
answer, as in short answer or fill-in-the blanks tests.
While theory and experiments such as this suggest that
napping could help student learning, there are of course practical constraints.
Time spent napping is time that content cannot be presented.
My experience as an educational consultant in schools is
that schools seem to conspire to make learning difficult. First, students are
constantly over-stimulated and distracted, not only by social interactions, but
by posters, pictures, and do-dads placed conspicuously all over the rooms and
in the halls. Many teachers allow students to multi-task, for example, using
cell and smart phones in class. Classes are commonly disturbed by loud
public-speaker announcements from the principal's office and by loud bells
signaling the end of class. Immediately after class, no quiet time is allowed
for reflection on what happened in class. Students actually start tuning out
about five minutes before the anticipated bell ring, and the bell causes them
to leap up, run out into the halls, and start socializing. Then, of course,
there is the emphasis on all manner of extracurricular activities that occupy
the minds of many students much more than curriculum. It's a wonder students
learn anything.
Finally, few if any teachers teach students how to learn.
The emphasis is on what to learn and on performing well on state-mandated test
scores. I have started to give teacher workshops to help teachers realize the
importance of developing learning competence in their students. If students had
better learning skills, the job of teaching would be much easier and student
test performance would improve automatically.
Source:
Lemos, N. et al. (2014). Naps in school can enhance the
duration of declarative memories learned by adolescents. Frontiers in Systems
Neuroscience. Vol. 8, article 103. Doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00103
Dr. Klemm is author of two books on learning and memory, Memory Power 101 and Better Grades, Less Effort.
So if I wanted to incorporate nap time in my second grade class' schedule, when would that take place? As I've experienced, nap times for elementary students normally came after lunch/recess. When would nap time be most effective? Before lunch when it's during literacy block, or after lunch, during math block?
ReplyDeleteI don't know if there is research this specific. My guess is right after lunch might be the best time, because food tends to make one sleepy. On the other hand, just before lunch has the advantage of promoting consolidation of what was just taught without the social distractions that occur at lunch time. You just have to test which is best.
ReplyDeleteBill K