adsense code

Monday, February 17, 2020

New Research on How Learning Changes the Brain


Learning programs the brain. It is nature’s way to create simultaneously both “hardware” and “software” for the brain. Neuroscientists have long known that learning experiences change the functional circuitry that is used to process and remember a given learning event. The circuit change is anatomical: electron microscope photographs reveal that the synaptic changes take the form of little blebs located on dendrites. These blebs are called “dendritic spines,” and their size and number change in response to learning and memory formation. You might think of the induced change as a physical location for information storage. What is stored at any given spine is an increase in the probability that the spine will participate in activations that generate recall of the stored memory from all the spines that were enhanced in creating the memory.
Functionally, the change operates as a template that resides more or less permanently that is available not only to recall the original learning event but to respond to similar events in the future. Of course, no one synapse accounts for these recall and programming effects. However, the learning and memory results from the collective enhancement of all the enhanced dendritic spines in the participating circuitry. The templates thus created provide a way for the brain to program itself for future capabilities. Learning how to solve one kind of task makes it easier to learn new tasks that are similar. This is the basis for the so-called “learning-set,” a concept introduced many decades ago by Harry Harlow.
We tend to think about such matters in the education of children. However, the principle applies at all ages, including seniors. The aging brain responds to learning the same way a child’s brain does: it grows new task-specific synapses that can be recruited for other uses.
The learning effect is manifest in the growth of existing synapses and the formation of new synapses. In the absence of mental stimulation, the spines degenerate. Indeed, a typical effect of aging is that the brain actually shrinks as a consequence of the cumulative shrinkage of spines. Many neurological diseases are characterized by reduced synaptic density: schizophrenia, autism, and dementia. An opposite problem occurs with drug addiction, where certain synaptic connections are strengthened by the drug, essentially creating a way to store a memory for the addiction.
Until now, we have not learned as much about the chemical changes that occur with learning. A recent study from Thomas Jefferson University reveals that new patterns of molecular organization develop as connections between neurons strengthen during learning. The researchers basically asked the question, “What does learning look like at the molecular level? Using super-resolution live-cell microscopy, the researchers confirmed the enlargement of synapses previously reported by others. But they also saw that that during a learning experience the molecules involved in sending and receiving the signals between neurons appeared to be organized in clumps or "nanomodules" that both dance and multiply when stimulated by learning-like signals.
The researchers developed a novel technique wherein they could visualize the chemical involved in transmitting signal from one neuron to another. Chemicals on the pre-synaptic side appeared green and those on the receiving postsynaptic sign appeared as red. Then while observing the colors, they observed live neurons in real time as they sent signals to each other via their neurotransmitter chemical systems. The color changes indicated that during signaling activity, the presynaptic chemicals clumped together and bound to clumped molecules on the postsynaptic side. The clumps appeared to have a uniform size. When the presynaptic neurons were stimulated in a way that promoted spine enlargement, they saw that the number of chemical clumps increased. Such stimulation caused non-moving clump to jiggle and move around the synaptic spine, with pre- and post-synaptic chemicals moving in lock-step. Maybe this jiggling helps to trigger the biochemical cascade that neurotransmission causes to change activity in the post-synaptic neuron.
Perhaps we don’t think enough about the movement of molecules in living tissue. All chemicals in solution bounce around randomly. Clumping together and jiggling in lock-step creates new ways for chemicals to produce their effects. Apparently, the clumping is the triggering event for the enlargement of dendritic spines that creates a structural basis for memory.
This kind of chemical interaction is not only relevant to learning. It also applies in unknown ways to the altered function in addictions and other neurological diseases in which strong interneuronal connections become too strong. Research on neurotransmitter clumping in disease states has not yet begun, but here we may find clues on how to treat some of these conditions. Clearly, disrupting the clumping would disrupt the ability to strengthen synapses. While we want our synapses strengthened to promote normal learning, we don’t want this to happen for example, for opiate pain relievers, which create addiction. At the molecular level, addiction is a learned condition.

Sources
Hruska, M. et al., "Synaptic nanomodules underlie the organization and plasticity of spine synapses," Nature Neuroscience, DOI: 10.1038/s41593-018-0138-9, 2018.
Klemm, W. R. Core Ideas in Neuroscience. https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/390780

Monday, February 03, 2020

Lifestyles that Promote Living Longer and Better



People in many parts of the world are living longer, due largely to improvements in medicine and healthier lifestyle afforded by less poverty. The downside is that the longer one lives the more likely a debilitating disease will emerge, such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, or Alzheimer's Disease. For many people, the important thing is not how long they live, but how long they can live without serious physical suffering.

Many studies have established that the incidence of the common debilitating diseases can be reduced or delayed by modifiable lifestyle factors. While genes can obviously affect one’s vulnerability to disease, genes may not be the primary factor in how long or how well one lives. This is suggested, for example, by one study of over 110,000 healthcare professionals (about 1/3 male, 2/3 female) that clearly showed the value of healthy lifestyles.

The investigators queried these subjects and categorized them according to five lifestyle criteria:

    Diet, as assessed using the Alternate Healthy Eating Index, with a score in the upper 40% indicating a healthy diet;
    Smoking (never vs ever);
    Moderate to vigorous physical activity (≥ 30 minutes/day);
    No alcohol consumption above 15 g/day for women, 30 g/day for men;
    Body mass index (18.5-24.9 kg/m2).

Women who met four of the five low-risk lifestyle factors lived 10 more years free of cancer, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes at 50 years than women who followed none of the low-risk factors. In men, the gain in disease-free life expectancy was near 8 years. In terms of total life expectancy, women in the low-risk group at age 50 showed an increase from 31.7 years to 41.1 and men increased their life span from 31.3 years to 39.4 years.

This large-scale study confirms what has been indicated by a host of earlier studies that healthy lifestyles involve proper diet, absence of smoking, low consumption of alcohol, substantial exercise, and a BMI in the range of 18.5-24.9 kg/m.2  Moreover, both women and men who have a healthy lifestyle have significantly more years in which they avoid crippling heart disease, cancer, and type 2 diabetes.

The largest impact was on reduced incidence of cardiovascular disease and diabetes in both women and men. The lifestyles that were most likely to increase the three major diseases were smoking and obesity, in both women and men. Perhaps beneficial effects would be magnified by more stringent healthy lifestyle criteria (for example, upper 10% of healthy diet or level of exercise).

Other posts on lifestyle and aging research have clearly identified other healthy factors, such as  the value of emotional well-being and reduced psychological stress. Anecdotes suggest that living a life of worthy purpose may also promote aging well and living longer, though apparently there is not much formal research on this possibility.

Though we have no direct control over our genes, most of us can largely control how we live our lives. The beneficial effects of healthy lifestyle on aging well and longevity surely include direct enhancement of organ function and indirect effects on gene expression. Healthy lifestyles will help you, as we say in Texas, "Go out with your boots on."

Source

Li, Yanping, et al. (2020). Healthy lifestyle and life expectancy free of cancer, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes: prospective cohort study, January 8, BMJ 2020; 368 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6669